Would You Finance a Burger? Klarna Thinks You Should

Klarna x DoorDash: Convenience or Debt Crisis in the Making?

Imagine waking up, checking your bank balance, and realizing you still owe money… for a burger you ate two weeks ago.

Sounds ridiculous, right? But thanks to Klarna and DoorDash, that’s now a reality.

Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) isn’t just for sneakers and laptops anymore. Now, you can finance your takeout. For some, it’s a lifeline. For others, it’s a fast track to a debt crisis.

Let’s talk about how Klarna just changed the way we think about food—and not necessarily for the better.

Buy now, pay later (BNPL) is making its way into food delivery, and it’s raising eyebrows. Klarna, the BNPL giant, has officially partnered with DoorDash, allowing customers to split their takeout orders into four interest-free payments.

At first glance, this seems like a win for consumers. Struggling families and individuals who can’t afford a meal today now have an option to pay later. But for those who never had access to credit cards or traditional financing, this move could normalize debt for essentials—leading to a financial spiral.

Let’s break down why Klarna and DoorDash made this move and whether it’s a savvy business strategy or a ticking time bomb.

Why Klarna and DoorDash Partnered

1. Expanding Klarna’s Market Beyond Retail
   Klarna built its empire on financing fashion, electronics, and big-ticket items. But the challenge? BNPL relies on repeat usage. Food delivery offers high-frequency transactions, making it an opportunity to increase engagement and customer retention.
   

2. DoorDash’s Growth Play
   DoorDash, like all delivery services, is in an expensive battle for customer loyalty. Offering Klarna gives them an edge, making it easier for customers to place orders without worrying about their bank balance at the moment of purchase.
   

3. The Psychology of Micro-Payments
   Splitting a $40 takeout order into four payments of $10 feels painless—until those payments stack up alongside grocery bills, rent, and other Klarna purchases. This model isn’t just about accessibility; it’s about increasing order frequency and cart size without immediate financial friction.

Is Deferring Payment on Food a Good Idea?

The Pros:
 ✅ Short-Term Relief for Those in Need – For families facing temporary cash flow issues, being able to eat today and pay later can be a lifeline.
✅ Increased Access to Convenience – Those without credit cards now have a flexible payment option for food delivery, just as they do for other expenses.
✅ More Business for Restaurants & Gig Workers – Higher order volumes mean more revenue for small businesses and more gigs for delivery drivers.

The Cons:
 ❌ Debt on Perishable Goods – Unlike a financed laptop or a pair of sneakers, food has zero long-term value. Carrying debt for something that’s gone in 30 minutes is risky.
❌ Normalization of Unnecessary Debt – Many BNPL users are young consumers without financial literacy training. Making debt feel “casual” could create long-term financial instability.
❌ Potential Regulatory Scrutiny – Governments are already eyeing BNPL for its unchecked lending practices. If debt starts piling up for necessities like food, expect regulatory intervention.

The Takeaway for Marketers

This move isn’t just about Klarna and DoorDash—it’s a sign of where consumer finance is heading. As economic pressure rises, businesses will increasingly remove “cost friction” at checkout. Marketers need to ask: Are we helping consumers, or are we leading them into financial traps?

For brands, Klarna’s expansion is a case study in frictionless spending psychology—but with an ethical dilemma attached. Companies that offer “buy now, pay later” need to think beyond short-term revenue spikes and consider the long-term financial health of their customers.

Would you order a meal today and worry about the bill later? Or is this a slippery slope? Hit reply and let me know what you think.

—
Want to stay ahead of the biggest marketing shifts? Subscribe to Future Proof Marketing.